Written by
Contic
Date
6 days ago
Read time
2 minutes
You can—but it depends what you’re really buying.
There are plenty of cheaper teams out there. Some can do decent work. But many clients come to us after a frustrating experience where the “cheap” option ended up costing far more—in time, stress, and rebuilds.
No clear scope or fixed timeline
No real product strategy or roadmap
Code quality that’s hard to maintain or scale
Designs that look okay but don’t convert or engage
No automated testing or deployment pipeline
No handover, documentation, or long-term plan
The end result? Something that might look like a product—but starts falling apart when real users touch it. Or worse, something that can’t evolve as your business grows.
Clean, scalable, production-grade code
Fixed-cost, time-bound launch
A clear roadmap with priorities, user flows, and feedback loops
A launch-ready product that doesn’t need to be rebuilt in 6 months
A UK-based, in-house team who’s invested in your long-term success
We’ve rebuilt too many “MVPs” that were never really viable in the first place. Our goal is to help you get it right the first time—so you can focus on growth, not fixing tech debt.
Choosing a cheaper option often means:
Higher future costs from rework and missed opportunities
Delays due to unclear scope or ghosted delivery
Lost momentum and team confidence
Products that aren’t fundable, scalable, or usable in the real world
The question isn't just “how much does it cost to build?”
It's “how much will it cost to fix, rebuild, or replace later?”
You can go cheaper—but you may end up paying more. We’re here for clients who want it done right: clear scope, clean engineering, and a team that builds products to last.