AI for UK SMEs: agents for customers, augmentation for staff
Want the long answer?
Read moreWritten by
Contic
Read time
2 minutes

We can, and we’ve done it for products where getting it wrong wasn’t an option. But the first thing we’ll check is whether you need to build anything at all. Many teams get most of the value from a licence, and we’ll say so.
That goes for founders and for operators running an established business. The question is the same either way: what job should the AI do, and what has to be true for it to do it well?
There are three ways to put AI to work, and most teams should start at the top.
Our rule of thumb is blunt. If an off-the-shelf tool does the whole job, buy it and don’t look back. If it does 80% of the job, look hard at the other 20%, because that’s where the pain lives. Our guide to off-the-shelf AI versus custom sets out the full decision.
A build earns its place when at least two of these are true:
If none of those fit, keep the licence and spend the money elsewhere. Our AI readiness scorecard helps you rank the jobs worth looking at.
Everyone’s Invited was receiving over 100 submissions a day. Each one had to be stripped of names, dates and locations before anyone reviewed it. Pasting survivors’ stories into a chat window was never going to be acceptable. The system we built has handled more than 50,000 submissions and saved around 12,500 hours of manual review.
Pristine Condition needed AI that checks someone’s lifting technique through a phone camera, in real time, with no signal. A spot check might happen in an aircraft cargo hold. We built it with TensorFlow, running on the phone itself. Usage has grown by around 9,000%, and around 150,000 warehouse staff now use it.
Neither project started with the model. Both started with the job, the people doing it and the data they had.
Most AI projects that go wrong don’t fail on the model. They fail because nobody checked the data first.
Here’s a quick test. Could a new member of staff do the job using only the data you’d give the system? If they’d need to ask a colleague or guess which version is current, the AI will struggle too.
Pick fifty real examples and try it. Our guide to getting your data ready for AI has the full checklist. If your product handles personal data, is our data safe if you use AI? covers that side.
Models change every few months, so we treat the model as a part you can swap. The instructions, the test set and the scoring sit outside it. When a better or cheaper model arrives, we run the tests against it and switch if it wins.
The target isn’t 100% accuracy. It’s doing better than the person doing the job today, measured on the same examples.
Less than you might fear to run, and more than the model bill to build. The model fees are often the smallest line in the budget. Our AI chatbot cost guide works through the numbers.
If AI is part of a new product or a major rebuild, it fits LaunchPad. Growth is £60k over three months and includes complex data and AI features, excluding VAT. For an internal tool, it starts with a free chat, then a paid discovery that ends in a scoped plan and a price.
Either way, you own the code and IP, as do I own the code and IP? explains. If someone has already half-built your AI feature, our free architectural review tells you what we’d keep and what we’d change. Our AI + data service shows how we approach the rest.
Want the long answer?
Read moreWe design, build and launch digital products at a fixed price, with a money-back guarantee after Discovery. Tell us what you have in mind.